“That is simple. In the colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it to pay to pay the government’s approved expenses and charities. We make sure it is issued in approved proportions to make goods pass easily from the producer to the consumers…In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control the purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one. You see, a legitimate government can both spend and lend money into circulation, while banks can only lend significant amounts of their promissory bank notes, for they neither can give away nor spend but a tiny fraction of the money people need. Thus, when your bankers here in England place money in circulation, there is always a debt principle to be returned and usury to be paid. The result is that you always have too little credit in circulation to give the workers full employment. You do not have too many workers, you have too little money in circulation, and that which circulates, all bears the endless burden of unpayable debt and usury.”

(From Web of Debt by E. H. Brown)

Tweet This Post 

Perhaps this is just such a time.

Has there been a time of such fear, uncertainty, and doubt in recent memory? What, exactly, is going on here?

A powerful lens into the situation would be the lens of the middle class in America in 2010.

They don’t want to be in stocks because the equity markets are going to crash.

They don’t want to buy bonds because they are now just printing them and there’s no way they will ever be able to pay off .

There are going to be defaults within the next couple of years and they don’t want to keep a lot of cash in an IRA because Timothy Geithner has his eyes on that and is thinking about new regulations to force all cash in retirement accounts into treasuries to save USD. This will be throwing money down the drain.

It is indeed possible that the government will essentially confiscate the savings of the middle classes by forcing it all into treasuries as a last ditch attempt to save the dollar. This also, is throwing money down the drain.

The question is will the middle class finally revolt before they can push it through?

All eyes are on the middle class right now. Only entertainers want all eyes on them. If you’re not an entertainer and all eyes are on you, you are most likely little more than prey.

What say you, fight or flight?

——–

Just saw this, by the way…looks like the middle class is in the news.

Tweet This Post 

So, what happened to force Nixon to take away the gas gauge, so to speak? The Vietnam war had driven America deeply into debt and France started to understand that there might not be enough gold to back up all those dollars so it asked for their $300 million in gold. That hurt. In 1971, Britain, after suffering the largest monthly trade deficit in their history requested their gold also…one third the gold reserves of the United States.

If the price of gold had been raised, that would probably have fixed the problem but it was decided to stick with the $35/oz price and Richard Nixon followed the advice of economist Milton Friedman and took the dollar off the gold standard, paving the way for the printing presses to start printing fiat currency.

True, there were problems with a gold standard. The price of gold fluctuated and was subject to manipulation by speculators and it also failed as global reserve currency because there was simply not enough gold to do what it needed to do.

Antal Fekete, writing in the Asia Times, has an opinion of all this, “This default, and the making of the dishonored debt money, was the cause of the destabilization of interest rates, as well as the explosive growth price volatility that has been plaguing the world ever since, causing ever greater economic distress.”

The gold system was flawed but the system of floating exchange rates has proven much worse.

We’ll end with a quote from Milton Friedman himself, “The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem. “

Tweet This Post 

This crafty system, first devised by seventeenth century goldsmiths who discovered that only about 10% of the population actually asked for their money at any given time, allows banks to lend $1000 for every $100 on deposit (a 9-1 ratio).

It gets interesting from time of deposit so follow closely; a bank receives a deposit of $100 and can loan out $90 of that deposit. If the borrower writes a check for $90 to someone who deposits it, the bank receiving it can now lend out $81. As the process continues, the banking system can expand the initial deposit of $100 into a maximum of $1000.

But don’t these funds belong to the people who deposited the money and expect it to be available at all times? Yes. The loan money, you could say, is counterfeited. Or you could say that’s just the way it works.

If you are baffled by this, you may want to read through the Chicago Federal Reserve’s, “Modern Money Mechanics“.

Tweet This Post 

“We are rapidly approaching a situation where the government must issue additional currency. It will very soon be the only move remaining. It should have been the first step in the recovery program. Immediately upon a revival of the demand that the government increase the supply of currency, we shall again be subjected to a barrage of skillfully designed and cunningly circulated propaganda by means of a small group of international bankers have been able, for two centuries to frighten the peoples of the civilized world agains issuing their own good money in sufficient quantities to carry on their necessary commerce. By this simple, but amazingly effective device these “money changers” – parasites in a busy world intent on creating and exchanging wealth – have been able to preserve for their private and exclusive right the monopoly of manufacturing an inferior substitute for money which they have hypnotized civilized nations into using, because of their pressing need to exchange goods and services. We shall never recover on credit.

(See “Web of Debt” by Ellen Hodgson Brown)

Tweet This Post